Welcome...

You've reached the shared blog of Michael Mckay and Todd Frederick. Two friends who have worked together in ministry and labored in similar educational endeavors. Please join us as we consider the interaction of Christianity with modern culture...

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Exploding the Sin Scale

The latest weekly installment on John Calvin. The close observer may note that it's posted at a decent hour of the day and two whole days before my prof sees it. I seem to have caught up on short-term projects and can devote some time to the long-term projects... Oh, balance you elude me.

Two years ago we experienced a fire that completely consumed my personal library. Over three thousand volumes perished in the blaze and ever since I’ve been carefully re-building my ‘precious,’ taking careful note of the recommendations of friends and professors. Each volume on the shelf, from the weighty tomes to the small handbooks represents not only the treasure of its content, but also the story of its acquisition. Every time I devote financial resources for the sake of literary expansion, I consider the loss of one well worth the gain of the other.

One of my most recent acquisitions occupies a place of honor on the reference section of my bookshelf. It even has an impressive title; it’s the ‘Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament based on Semantic Domains’. I can be a bit of a snob about my books and I began my quest for this particular gem looking for a new copy. I found one online for the low, low bargain price of 480.00. Choking and spitting, I laid my snobbery aside and began perusing the used copies from various resellers. Descending from three hundred into the two hundreds I began to despair of finding an affordable copy of this must-have resource. Digging deep, I finally found a copy for sixty bucks, shipping included! In my mind, I saved a bundle of money, got the book and preserved a happy marriage.

Everyone uses comparisons to judge the value or cost of economic items. We compare every item we consider purchasing against an internal scale of value, often set by an ‘anchor,’ which can be quite arbitrary. In the case of my dictionary purchase, the new price set the anchor by which to compare other copies. Choosing one thing over another, we decide that possessing it brings us greater utility (value) than retaining the money we use to buy it. Billions of times every day, purchases and trades occur according to that internal value scale.

Comparing the cost of my book to other prices convinced my internal value scale that I had found a bargain, but the scale doesn’t only work for economic costs. We determine the cost of moral behavior in much the same way. As we compare ourselves to others around us, we pleasantly evaluate our good behaviors and decry our weaknesses, the few that we actually find. We even use the Ten Commandments as a set of moral guidelines by which we measure our success or failure. Reading “you shall not murder” leads us to a positive evaluation of our character. This positive evaluation assumes, of course, that we have not taken the life of another human being. John Calvin points out that the negative command also assumes a positive character; and the degree of the command extends in proportion to the prohibition. Wordy, I know, but the meaning is this: If I must not kill, then I must do my utmost to promote life. This expansion of the value scale places comparatively minor sins on the losing side of the equation. Calvin says this:

"In considering vices we are often deceived because we reduce their importance if they are a a little bit hidden; so the Lord draws us back from this deception and accustoms us to putting each fault under a category by which we can better understand how we ought to loath it."

The question for us all is not, “Have I killed anyone today?” nor is it “Have I hated anyone?” These may not be exactly equal, but they exist on the same side of the value scale: the bad side. The real question is, “have I done my utmost to love my fellow man today?” Against this standard, we deeply feel our need for God’s grace and enablement to fulfill the absolute opposite of killing, namely, love our fellow man or woman so much that we do all we can to promote life.

5 comments:

  1. I have heard this argument before concerning the 10 commandments; mainly from Reformed thinkers. This makes sense if Calvin is the one who initiated thinking along these lines. It sounds good at first, but I have some reservations which bother me.
    First, does the command, "You shall not murder" really mean, "You shall love your neighbor"? Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but it seems that is what Calvin is saying. If so what does the command, "You shall not covet" mean? Or, "You shall not commit adultery"? Or, "You shall have no other gods before me"? It seems like the opposite of murder is "not-murder", and not as Calvin thinks - "life". The opposite of covetousness is not giving all my possessions away but is "not-covetousness". I guess it gets too subjective when we try and take the opposite of the command as the real intent.
    My second thought is in relation to civil law. When the government says to not steal my neighbor's stereo, they are not saying that I should give my neighbor anything. They are specifically stating to not take something. In other words you can't legislate love, charity, friendship, etc. Civil law only provides the lowest form of morality, civility. What is the difference between civil law and God's Law? Definitely the authority, but I would also add that God's law clearly states to "Love the Lord your God (and your neighbor)".
    Perhaps, the Law "You shall not murder" just means that I should not murder and ends there. What am I missing?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have noticed and been challenged recently along these lines. Not because I find the negative commands in scripture ("Do Not Murder") and do the opposite but because in the New Testament it seems like Paul says to do that.

    Paul, in instructing us what the Christ life should look like, tells us that avoiding the negative isn't enough...that isn't all that Christ did; he also did the positive. I think this concept is best seen in Ephesians 4:25-32 with concepts like:

    "Put away falsehood...Tell the truth"
    "If you are a thief stop stealing...give to those in need"
    "Don't use foul or abusive language...Let everything you say be good and helpful"
    "Get rid of all bitterness, rage, anger, harsh words, and slander...be kind to each other, tenderhearted, forgiving one another."

    I wonder if this is the idea that John Calvin had in mind (in which case it wouldn't come from him but from Paul).

    Either way, the concept is scriptural to an extent. Any scriptural truth can be twisted or manipulated into something it was never intended to be.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey guys
    Addressing Michael's points:
    1. I think there's a difference in the way Calvin does exegesis and the way we are trained to do it. For Calvin, he sees the tiny pieces and the larger context of both testaments at the same time. We are taught to examine the pieces in tight relation to small circles of context, only after a careful focus on the small pieces do we branch out into other aspects of context... For Calvin, it's easy to see the opposite of 'do not murder' because in other places Scripture counsels to 'love our neighbor.' It may be that Calvin's exegesis is secondary to exhortation.
    2. Calvin may consider civil government as a separate issue. The third chapter of the Institutes only addresses the ten commandments. I think you have a great point here, that God's law addresses the heart, which He always sees. I think Calvin also seeks to address the heart issue.
    Dennis:
    I think Michael has a good hermeneutical point. We can't really use a 'hermeneutic of the opposite,' it's better to see the expansion of the ten commandments from other contexts. i.e. to examine Deuteronomy as Moses' exposition of the ten commandments and derive comparative meaning for today from Mo's extrapolations (guided by the Holy Spirit of course).
    Another thought, Dennis: why are you posting on a blog on FRIDAY NIGHT? Good gravy, man, get out of the house!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Todd, I would be ashamed about you calling me out for being a loser but when the high point of my week is seeing a new blog posted by you, then I am a loser :)

    Honestly though, I am really enjoying hearing your guy's thoughts. I really looked up to both of you two at the BI and enjoyed learning from both of you. Thanks for the excellent posts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm glad you're enjoying the blog, Dennis. If you notice, I responded to your post on... Friday night. Go figure.

    ReplyDelete