I’m
about three-quarters done with my first pleasure read of the winter break (The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse)
and it brings out some really important ideas about how public conversation
dances around the idea of God, without ever bringing Him into the discussion in
a meaningful way.
Everyone
acknowledges that Sandy Hook is a national tragedy. The murder of innocent
children is perhaps the most heinous, vicious and unforgivable act any person
could ever do. Language stretches to encompass our pain and sadness; we all
weep for the living faced with the sudden absence of their loved ones. While everyone
acknowledges the wrongness of the murder of innocents, very few discuss why it’s
such a crime.
Every
worldview has to give reasons for moral prescriptions. You may not steal. But…
why? The modern secular conception of ethics relies on community standards or a
vague notion of harm. It is wrong to harm another person. But what does harm
mean? How is the harm principle applied? How can you define wrong in an ethical
situation without recourse to God? These are important and difficult questions.
It is wrong to steal from another person because it harms them, and harming
another person is wrong. But what about usurious interest rates; isn’t that
harmful? Or what about punitive taxation? We can readily agree that theft is
wrong, but start poking at the rules and you need something bigger. The Christian
worldview asserts that God sets the moral standards for humanity, and that the foundation
for moral prescriptions is based on a fundamental fact of human creation: God
created man in His image. Thus the violation of that image by theft, or even
worse, by murder is a crime against man and against God.
Look
again at the tragedy of Sandy Hook. From a secular perspective, the crime is
against humanity: we, the human race agree that the murder of innocents is
wrong. From a theistic perspective, it’s a whole different situation: the
murder of those innocent children is a crime against God Himself, because He
made mankind in His image and He prohibits the violation of His image by illicit
life-taking. This doesn’t diminish man, but raises him up to a level of honor
and respect. It helps us define the tragedy of the murder of those innocent
children, but it also helps us define the tragic lack of care for the
killer, because he, too, is created in God’s image. Even though his acts were
heinous, society has a responsibility to properly deal with people who are a danger
to themselves or others because they are created in God’s image. This applies whether he was mentally ill and thus in need of treatment, or morally depraved and thus should be handled by incarceration or some combination of the two. We fall short
as a society precisely because we have excluded God from our discussion of what’s
wrong with our country, and, more importantly, why it’s wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment